Letter to Charles Cotesworth Pinckney from George Washington, May 24, 1796.
Dublin Core
Title
Letter to Charles Cotesworth Pinckney from George Washington, May 24, 1796.
Creator
Date
1791-05-24
Subject
Description
In this private letter, George Washington asks if either Charles Cotesworth Pinckney or Edward Rutledge will accept the office of Associate Justice on the United States Supreme Court (recently vacated by John Rutledge).
2023-01-06
600 dpi, 16-bit depth, color, Epson Expression 10000XL.
Rights
Copyright has not been assigned to the Charleston Library Society. All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Special Collections Librarian. Permission for publication is given on behalf of the Charleston Library Society as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained by the researcher.
Format
image/jpeg
Type
StillImage
Source
Ms. 178, George Washington Correspondence
Identifier
Ms178let02
Text Item Type Metadata
Transcription
Columbia May 24th 1791.
Gentlemen –
Private
An address to you jointly on a subject of the following nature may have a singular appearance
Gentlemen –
Private
An address to you jointly on a subject of the following nature may have a singular appearance
but that singularity will not exceed the evidence which is thereby given of my opinion of, and confidence in you
and of the opinion I entertain of your confidence in, and friendship for each other.
The office lately resigned by the Honble Mr. J. Rutledge in the Supreme Judiciary of the Union remains to be filled. Will either of you two Gentlemen accept it? — and in that case, which of you? It will occur to you that appointments to offices in the recess of the Senate are temporary, but of their confirmation in such a case there can be no doubt.
It may be asked why a proposition similar to this has never been made to you before
The office lately resigned by the Honble Mr. J. Rutledge in the Supreme Judiciary of the Union remains to be filled. Will either of you two Gentlemen accept it? — and in that case, which of you? It will occur to you that appointments to offices in the recess of the Senate are temporary, but of their confirmation in such a case there can be no doubt.
It may be asked why a proposition similar to this has never been made to you before
this is my answer your friends whom
whom I have often conversed with on like occasions, have always given it as their decided opinion that no place in the disposal of the genl Government could be a compensation for the relinquishment of your private pursuits
whom I have often conversed with on like occasions, have always given it as their decided opinion that no place in the disposal of the genl Government could be a compensation for the relinquishment of your private pursuits
or, in their belief would withdraw you from them. In making the attempt, however, in the present instance I discharge my duty, and shall await your answer (which I wish to receive soon) for the issue. Of my sincere esteem & regard for you both I wish you to be assured and that
I am Gentlemen
Your most Obedt. & Affect.
Humble Servant
G. Washington
Chas Cotesworth Pinckney & Edwd Rutledge Esqrs
I am Gentlemen
Your most Obedt. & Affect.
Humble Servant
G. Washington
Chas Cotesworth Pinckney & Edwd Rutledge Esqrs
Collection
Citation
Washington, George, “Letter to Charles Cotesworth Pinckney from George Washington, May 24, 1796.,” Charleston Library Society Digital Collections, accessed December 10, 2025, https://charlestonlibrarysociety.omeka.net/items/show/1483.

